R&D

Plan for the Best, Prepare for the Worst - Handling Uncertainty in R&D

Where the Uncertainty Lies

Assets in mid to late-stage development are seldom immune to uncertainty surrounding their efficacy and safety profiles as well as that of their competitors. When considering these variables along with launch timing and the potential for reimbursement friction, traditional techniques such as conjoint analysis are rendered ineffective. Such circumstances require far more objective, dynamic, and future-proofed approaches.

A Data-Driven Approach

Using our unmet need framework, Equinox Group consistently quantifies the clinical improvement offered by a drug using a metric that we call Clinical Innovation. This measure has proven to be highly predictive of peak-year patient share and has been the basis of our analyses for over 30 years.

By objectively quantifying the Clinical Innovation of a new drug and all of its relevant competitors, we enable our clients to prepare for all possible scenarios that they will face during development and to seamlessly toggle between them.

Wargaming with Multiple TPPs

By quantifying the uncertainty in a given indication, we can understand its implications with remarkable accuracy.

Consider, for example, a chronic disease with three agents currently in the market. Working alongside the client, we come up with a base case, an upside case, and a downside case for their new drug, taking into account efficacy, safety, side effects, dosing, administration, price, and launch timing. Under the base case, the new drug achieves 20.3% share of drug-treated patients by the end of 2031. Under the upside and downside cases, it achieves 29.3% and 14.7% respectively. As a result, in a world where no competitors are launching in the coming years, we have bounded the share potential between 14.7% and 29.3%. By assigning probabilities to each of the three scenarios, a simple weighted average will yield the expected share by the end of 2031 under the assumed conditions. In this example the modeled probabilities of the base, upside, and downside cases are 71%, 21%, and 8%. This results in an expected value of 21.7% patient-share by 2031.

Figure 1: Launching without a threat

Introducing Competitors

By studying the different scenarios in Figure 1, it is clear that the client agent has moderate potential. Now, consider a highly innovative competitor, which we call Threat 1. With Threat 1 launching one year later than the client agent, it will have considerable, yet diminished, impact on the terminal shares. Now, the client agent 10.4% patient-share in the base case and 19.0% and 6.1% in the upside and downside cases respectively.

Using the same probabilities of 71%, 21%, and 8%, we get an expected value of 11.9% patient-share by 2031. These probabilities can be informed by input of the client organization and approximated through Monte Carlo simulations, which are easily implemented into our framework when handling uncertainty around all relevant product attributes including launch timing.

Analyses like this can be made as complex as needed, allowing for up to 15 different drug profiles, characterizing the variety of potential attributes of your drug as well as all relevant competitors.

Figure 2: Launching with a threat

What About When the Data Changes?

Whether it be new clinical data pertaining to your agent or any of its competitors, the dynamic nature of these models allows client organizations to change the relevant inputs within a matter of minutes with no additional cost. That means no need for funding 50 additional interviews with leading physician’s, no need for creating new stimuli, no guesswork, and no time wasted in order to obtain new patient-share estimates. 


Equinox Group has fine-tuned these methodologies and others over the past 30 years to help biopharmaceutical companies handle challenges in R&D. Our specialties range from disease-area strategy and market access to patient share forecasting and patient flow modeling.

To learn more about our process, click here to schedule a meeting with one of our practice leaders.

 

Measuring Risk in R&D

The Problem

It is no secret in the biopharmaceutical industry that a new drug’s clinical improvement is strongly predictive of the share of patients it achieves. Consequently, drugs that offer little clinical improvement expose developers to commercial risk.

Many organizations, while aware of this problem, continue to lack a proven methodology to identify and quantify that risk. This exposes them to the possibility of advancing undifferentiated drugs that will experience low market access and vulnerability to future competition.

The Solution

Equinox Group has quantified the relationship between clinical improvement and patient share by comparing the magnitude of improvement delivered vs. share achieved in the real world in a large set of historical drug launches. Clinical improvement reflects advances in efficacy, safety, tolerability, dosing, and patient outcomes. Our metric for clinical improvement includes all of these domains and measures the percent reduction in medical need the new drug offers relative to the standard of care. We call that measure of improvement  “Clinical Innovation”.

Measuring Clinical Innovation: A Data-Driven Approach

For 30 years, Equinox Group has used a validated, data-driven approach to measure the clinical innovation offered by new drugs across hundreds of indications. See this two-minute video explanation:

The Link to Commercial Potential

Over many years we have re-evaluated the relationship between clinical innovation and patient share; it has been remarkably stable over time. Below is a table of historical drug launches and where they score in the Equinox Group framework.

As a rule of thumb,

  • High Innovation: Drugs that offer 10% or more clinical innovation nearly always dominate the branded segments of their markets.

  • Medium Innovation: Drugs with 5% to 10% innovation usually compete well.

  • Low Innovation: Drugs with 0-5% improvement are in a gray zone and may be seen as undifferentiated, especially by payers.

  • Lack of Innovation: Drugs with negative clinical innovation nearly always get low patient shares and disappointing sales.

How Much Clinical Innovation is Enough?

The clinical attributes anticipated in early R&D programs are rarely realized by the end of development. As time goes on, assets often acquire “warts,” whether it be unexpected side effects, lower than expected efficacy, or both. Programs that start with modest clinical aspirations are likely to offer unacceptable levels of innovation at launch.  We call this phenomenon “attribute drift.”

We recommend that drug development teams aim to achieve clinical innovation of at least 5% to reduce exposure to attribute drift and the commercial risks described in the beginning of this paper. Our tools allow teams to tie the expected clinical attributes of a new drug first to its level of clinical innovation, and then to patient share to forecast revenue potential.

The Take-Home

Equinox Group’s proven method to measure clinical innovation and predict peak-year patient share for target product profiles is accurate.  It’s also less expensive, more flexible, and quicker to execute than conventional market research-based techniques.  We use this approach to inform decisions about individual programs (pipeline and BD), to help therapeutic area teams set aspirations, and to inform R&D portfolio assessments.

Who Are We?

Since 1995, Equinox Group has provided analytics to support R&D decisions at biopharmaceutical firms, assessing the potential of drugs from discovery to launch. Our validated techniques will save you time and money, as well as overcome the deficiencies of traditional market research.

We have evaluated thousands of drug profiles across hundreds of indications in oncology, immunology, rare diseases, cardio-metabolic disorders, infectious disease, neurology, pulmonology, urology, ophthalmology, and endocrine disorders. We also have tailored methods to solve the unique analytical challenges that arise in oncology and rare diseases.

Using this methodology, we have developed a suite of tools to inform whatever R&D decisions you’re facing in any stage of development, including: setting indication priorities, supporting go/no-go decisions, assessing market access and pricing potential, share forecasting, and patient flow modeling.